rs,
051. Code : PRSMJOHNSN Dear Sir, BSE Limited, Corporate Relationship Department, P. J. Towers, Dalal Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400 023. Code : 500338 Pursuant to Regulation 30 and 51 of the SEBI
7.8%
1,796 1,666 1,660 1,538 Q1 FY25 Q2 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26 Q1 FY26 revenue grew by 7.8% YoY mainly due to strong growth in Prism Cement; HRJ revenues grew by 1.4% YoY, while Prism RMC
1.4%
FY26 revenue grew by 7.8% YoY mainly due to strong growth in Prism Cement; HRJ revenues grew by 1.4% YoY, while Prism RMC revenue declined by 4.9% YoY Prism RMC, 18.7% HRJ, 30.4% Prism Cement
4.9%
rong growth in Prism Cement; HRJ revenues grew by 1.4% YoY, while Prism RMC revenue declined by 4.9% YoY Prism RMC, 18.7% HRJ, 30.4% Prism Cement, 50.9% Prism Cement constituted 50.9% of Q1
18.7%
ement; HRJ revenues grew by 1.4% YoY, while Prism RMC revenue declined by 4.9% YoY Prism RMC, 18.7% HRJ, 30.4% Prism Cement, 50.9% Prism Cement constituted 50.9% of Q1 FY26 revenues; HRJ cons
30.4%
venues grew by 1.4% YoY, while Prism RMC revenue declined by 4.9% YoY Prism RMC, 18.7% HRJ, 30.4% Prism Cement, 50.9% Prism Cement constituted 50.9% of Q1 FY26 revenues; HRJ constituted 30.4%
50.9%
Y, while Prism RMC revenue declined by 4.9% YoY Prism RMC, 18.7% HRJ, 30.4% Prism Cement, 50.9% Prism Cement constituted 50.9% of Q1 FY26 revenues; HRJ constituted 30.4% and Prism RMC constit
12.6%
in (%) 155 197 174 57 46 Q1 FY25 Q2 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26 Q1 FY26 EBITDA grew by 12.6% YoY; Prism Cement EBITDA / tonne grew from ₹ 654 in Q1 FY25 to ₹ 708 primarily due to decline in
₹ 654
FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26 Q1 FY26 EBITDA grew by 12.6% YoY; Prism Cement EBITDA / tonne grew from ₹ 654 in Q1 FY25 to ₹ 708 primarily due to decline in power & fuel and other costs; HRJ EBITDA remained
₹ 708
Y26 Q1 FY26 EBITDA grew by 12.6% YoY; Prism Cement EBITDA / tonne grew from ₹ 654 in Q1 FY25 to ₹ 708 primarily due to decline in power & fuel and other costs; HRJ EBITDA remained flat on a YoY basis
39.5%
el and other costs; HRJ EBITDA remained flat on a YoY basis, while Prism RMC EBITDA declined by 39.5% YoY 9.3% 10.0% 9.7% 3.7% 2.8% Q1 FY25 Q2 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26 Q1 FY26 EBITDA marg
9.3%
r costs; HRJ EBITDA remained flat on a YoY basis, while Prism RMC EBITDA declined by 39.5% YoY 9.3% 10.0% 9.7% 3.7% 2.8% Q1 FY25 Q2 FY25 Q3 FY25 Q4 FY25 Q1 FY26 Q1 FY26 EBITDA margin expand