What Actually Happens When an Indian Company Goes Bankrupt: A Guide to IBC Resolution

When a listed Indian company defaults on its debt, most retail investors panic-sell the stock and move on. The more curious ones might follow the headlines — "NCLT admits insolvency petition," "resolution plan approved," "liquidation ordered" — without fully understanding what these terms mean or how the process affects their investment.

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), enacted in 2016, fundamentally changed how corporate defaults are resolved in India. Before the IBC, recovering money from a defaulting company was a multi-decade ordeal involving the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), Debt Recovery Tribunals, and an opaque web of legal proceedings that overwhelmingly favoured incumbent promoters. Companies would default, continue operating under their original management, and creditors would wait 15-20 years for resolution — if it ever came.

The IBC was designed to fix this. Whether it has succeeded is a more complicated question.

How the Process Starts

The IBC process begins when a financial creditor (typically a bank or NBFC), an operational creditor (a supplier or vendor owed money), or the company itself files an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking to initiate a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).

The threshold for filing is a minimum default of ₹1 crore. Once the NCLT admits the application, several things happen immediately. The management of the company is suspended. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is appointed to take over the affairs of the company. A moratorium is declared, which prevents any legal proceedings, asset seizures, or recovery actions against the company during the resolution process. The company continues to operate as a going concern under the IRP's supervision, but the promoters lose control.

This transfer of control is the most consequential feature of the IBC. Under the old regime, defaulting promoters could delay proceedings indefinitely while continuing to enjoy the benefits of controlling the company. Under the IBC, they are removed from management within days of the NCLT admission. This single feature has changed the incentive structure for corporate India — promoters now have a powerful incentive to avoid default, because default means losing control of their own company.

The Committee of Creditors

Once the CIRP begins, a Committee of Creditors (CoC) is constituted, comprising all financial creditors of the company. Each creditor's voting power is proportional to the debt owed to them. The CoC is the decision-making body that evaluates resolution plans, negotiates with potential buyers, and ultimately decides the fate of the company.

Operational creditors — suppliers, employees, government tax authorities — are not part of the CoC and do not have voting rights, though they are entitled to receive at least the liquidation value of their claims under any approved resolution plan. This asymmetry has been one of the most contested aspects of the IBC, with operational creditors arguing that they are unfairly subordinated to financial creditors.

The logic behind the distinction is that financial creditors (banks) have the expertise and incentive to evaluate complex resolution plans, while operational creditors (who may number in the hundreds for a large company) would make the process unwieldy. Whether this logic justifies the significant haircuts that operational creditors often take is a legitimate debate.

The Resolution Plan

The core of the CIRP is the solicitation and evaluation of resolution plans. The Resolution Professional (RP) invites expressions of interest from potential buyers (called resolution applicants). These applicants submit detailed plans for how they would acquire the company, how much they would pay creditors, and how they would run the business going forward.

The CoC evaluates these plans and votes. A plan requires approval by at least 66% of voting share (by value of debt). The approved plan is then submitted to the NCLT for final approval.

In practice, resolution plans have resulted in widely varying recovery rates. In some high-profile cases — like Essar Steel (now ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel) and Bhushan Steel (now Tata Steel BSL) — creditors recovered 80-90% of their claims. These cases are cited as IBC success stories.

But these are outliers. The average recovery rate across all IBC resolutions has been considerably lower — often in the range of 30-40% of admitted claims. For small and mid-sized companies, recovery rates can be as low as 5-15%. And for cases that end in liquidation rather than resolution, creditors typically recover almost nothing.

The Timeline Problem

The IBC originally mandated that the CIRP must be completed within 180 days, extendable by 90 days — a total of 270 days. This was designed to ensure speed and certainty, addressing one of the primary failures of the pre-IBC regime.

In practice, the 270-day timeline has been honored more in the breach than in the observance. Complex cases involving large companies with multi-billion-dollar claims routinely take 500-800 days or more. The Essar Steel resolution took over 800 days. Videocon took over 1,500 days. Legal challenges, appeals to the NCLAT (National Company Law Appellate Tribunal) and the Supreme Court, and disputes among creditors all extend the process.

The Supreme Court's 2020 judgment clarified that the 330-day limit (including litigation time) is mandatory but not fatal — meaning delays do not automatically result in liquidation. This pragmatic ruling acknowledged the reality that complex cases cannot always be resolved in 270 days, but it also weakened the urgency that the original timeline was designed to create.

For equity investors, the timeline is critical. The longer a company remains in CIRP, the more its value deteriorates. Key employees leave. Customers find alternative suppliers. Technology becomes outdated. Working capital erodes. The company that eventually emerges from resolution is often a diminished version of what entered it.

What Happens to Shareholders

This is the part retail investors care about most, and the answer is usually painful. In a resolution process, equity shareholders are at the bottom of the priority waterfall — below secured creditors, unsecured creditors, operational creditors, and government dues. Shareholders receive value only if there is anything left after all other claims are satisfied.

In the vast majority of IBC resolutions, equity shareholders receive nothing. Their shares are either cancelled outright or diluted to near-zero as part of the resolution plan. The resolution applicant — the new buyer — typically acquires the company by injecting fresh capital and taking over the existing debt, not by buying shares from existing shareholders.

This is not a flaw in the system. It is how bankruptcy is supposed to work. Equity represents ownership, and ownership means bearing the residual risk. When a company's liabilities exceed its assets, the residual value of equity is zero by definition. Shareholders who bought stock in a company that subsequently went bankrupt took a risk that did not pay off.

The lesson for retail investors is clear: if a company you own enters CIRP, the probabilistic expectation for your equity value is zero. Selling immediately — even at a steep discount — is almost always the rational decision. Holding in hopes of a recovery is, in most cases, a form of loss aversion that compounds the original loss with opportunity cost.

Has the IBC Worked?

The IBC has unquestionably improved India's insolvency resolution framework compared to what existed before. Resolution timelines, while exceeding statutory limits, are dramatically shorter than the 15-20 year marathons of the pre-IBC era. The threat of losing control has incentivized many promoters to resolve defaults before they reach the NCLT — these pre-admission settlements are an underappreciated success of the IBC.

But the system faces real challenges. NCLT benches are understaffed and overworked. The number of cases admitted has far exceeded the system's capacity to process them. Recovery rates for non-headline cases remain low. And the principle of "creditor in control" has sometimes been undermined by litigation and promoter resistance.

For investors, the IBC has made corporate India more disciplined but not risk-free. Understanding the process — particularly the reality that equity value is almost always wiped out in insolvency — is essential for anyone investing in companies with significant debt or deteriorating credit quality. The IBC does not eliminate the risk of corporate failure. It simply ensures that failure is resolved faster and more predictably than before.

Parliament Signal

Daily briefing on what Parliament discussed and what it means for your portfolio.