Greenlam Industries Limited
9,827words
179turns
14analyst exchanges
3executives
Management on call
Saurabh Mittal
MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, GREENLAM INDUSTRIES
Ashok Sharma
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER – GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Samarth Agarwal
FINANCE TEAM, GREENLAM INDUSTRIES LIMITED
Key numbers — 40 extracted
Rs.20
25 crore
42%
Rs.1700 crore
100 crore
80%
50%
46%
Rs.500
crore
12%
15%
Rs.25
Advertisement
Guidance — 20 items
Saurabh Mittal
opening
“We also had experienced certain unexpected cost increases in the month of February for which we’ve undertaken price hikes again in the market which have been partially and will be implemented in Q1 of FY23.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“Yes, we clearly are aware that the growth is not up to what we expect it to do.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“On the CAPEX of FY23-24, the existing manufacturing plants will just need routine CAPEX of about Rs.20, 25 crores annually, the major CAPEX will be the two new plants in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“Where until now we spent about Rs.100 odd crores, say Rs.200 crores already and the CAPEX of those two plants will be shy of Rs.1000 crores which will be spent in FY23 and FY24 in two years.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“But yes, the intention will be to scale back the business, last year again, like we repeated ourselves, we had about 25 days of shutdown of the plant.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“As far as particleboard is concerned, the expenses will be spread over FY23 and FY24 exact percent maybe Ashok can respond, because the major equipment have been finalized and we’ve already paid out the initial advances, et cetera.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“And the particleboard expense will be in two years, both the years will be slightly in this around 45%, 50% in this year and the remaining in the next year.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“In FY24, we’ll have three lines coming up so, next year with newer capacity and they are of three different sizes.”
Saurabh Mittal
qa
“So, clearly, our endeavor will be to bring those new capacities to a meaningful utilization at the earliest.”
Udit Gajiwala
qa
“And sir lastly any guidance or any point you’d like to put on the laminates margin front going ahead because we have seen constant pressure on that front since few quarters, we are taking price hikes?”
Risks & concerns — 10 flagged
So, I see that the laminate business is what is driving the growth for the company, whereas the non-laminate business be it decorative or the other wood, and the wooden flooring, doors, and flooring all remain either in a lower utilization or weak profitability.
— Rajesh Kumar Ravi
Just a few follow-ups, first on the veneer side, if I see two, or three years back you had relatively healthy revenues, and this area we have seen a sharp decline in the numbers.
— Rajesh Kumar Ravi
So, I don’t think that’s a huge matter of concern.
— Saurabh Mittal
So, I don’t think that’s a matter of concern.
— Saurabh Mittal
And sir lastly any guidance or any point you’d like to put on the laminates margin front going ahead because we have seen constant pressure on that front since few quarters, we are taking price hikes?
— Udit Gajiwala
We look at it as a Y-o-Y decline, could you specify the reasons why we’ve seen a fall in terms of volumes even in the domestic market?
— Sneha Talreja
So, for the external borrowing that in this scenario it’s difficult to comment on because the interest rates are going up, but we expect that within around 2%, 3% within the external and for the external borrowing and for the domestic will all depend on what the rate at that moment of time, but as of now, it’s in the range of around 7, 7.5.
— Ashok Sharma
phenol and melamine you said correctly there is one more methanol and in terms of that the price of phenol is not soften, whether it is from the melamine price, you are correct melamine and methanol price has corrected from what it was there in peak, but the price of phenol is not reduced or not, rather it has firmed up post these Russia war, Ukraine war this has firmed up from what it was there previously.
— Ashok Sharma
So, this is, and as far as the targeting of architects, IDs is a concern, it’s a normal course of business architects, IDs, contractors, OEMs, they play a large part in terms of influencing and specifying the product.
— Saurabh Mittal
Sir, I understand that in a volatile environment according to cost it’s difficult to comment on the margins.
— Jenish Karia
Advertisement
Q&A — 14 exchanges
Speaking time
52
34
16
16
13
10
8
8
6
6
Advertisement
Opening remarks
Saurabh Mittal
Thank you Diksha. Good afternoon friends, and welcome to the call. I’m joined by Ashok our CFO, Samarth, and by the SGA team, our Relationship Advisors. So, on the results, I’ll give you a brief about the quarter and the year, update about the new projects. And Ashok will take you through the exact math and the data. So, Q4 for us overall we think went quite well. And this was despite the challenges at the Behror plant in the month of Jan and a few days of February, where we nearly lost about Rs.20-25 crores worth of sales. We also had experienced certain unexpected cost increases in the month of February for which we’ve undertaken price hikes again in the market which have been partially and will be implemented in Q1 of FY23. In the last quarter in Q4, we also had higher finished goods inventory at the plant and other ports due to the unavailability of containers and delays in vessels, which have actually dampened the revenue growth and are showing up on our inventory. But despite all
Ashok Sharma
Thank you, sir. Let me take you through the financial performance. For consolidated net revenue for the quarter grew by 11.6% on a Y-o-Y basis and grew by 3% consequently. We stood at Rs.463 crore as against Rs.415 crore previous year. Gross margin was down by 380 basis point, 44.9% in Q4 from 48.7% in Q4 last year, on a sequential basis gross margin was up by 60 basis points. Gross margin in absolute terms grew by 2.7% to Rs.208 crore in Q4 as compared to Rs.202 crore in Q4 last year. EBITDA margin was down by 540 basis point at 10.7% in Q4 as compared to 16.1% in Q4 FY21. On a sequential basis, EBITDA margin was down by 120 basis point. EBITDA in absolute term de-grew by 26% to Rs.49.6 crore in Q4 as compared to Rs.67 crore Q4 last year. Net profit for the quarter stood at Rs.25.7 crore as against Rs.30.9 crore Q4 previous year. For a year as a whole consolidated net revenue grew by 42% and stood at Rs.1703 crore as against Rs.1200 crores last year. Gross margin was down by 520 basis
Advertisement