Mahindra EPC Irrigation Limited
6,382words
27turns
3analyst exchanges
1executives
Management on call
Ramesh Ramachandran
MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHINDRA EPC IRRIGATION LIMITED
Key numbers — 40 extracted
3.8%
rs,
6.5%
7.2%
20%
30%
40%
9.7 million
14%
15%
72 million
5.1%
Advertisement
Guidance — 16 items
Coming to the year under review
qa
“For the year under review, which is FY'25, the first half of FY'25 saw a de-growth over the same period of FY'24 due to strong headwinds on account of general elections, which I am sure you're aware of.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“However, the second half of FY'25 for the industry was much better than the first half and the industry grew in the second half compared to the same period in FY'24.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“Against that industry context, let me now come to the performance of your company in FY'25.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“And this translates to 2 million hectares a year versus what we estimate to be a 1.1 million hectares of micro irrigation actually done in FY'25.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“As reference, FY'25 AP coverage was 1.2 lakh hectares.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“For instance, the groundwater uses efficiency scheme through Atal Bhujal Yojana, the inclusion of pressurized piping systems in the detailed project reports for major irrigation projects, the modernizing of command area development and water management.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“The effect of this, of course, will be realized in improving the area and the micro irrigation in the future.”
Coming to the year under review
qa
“In fact, as a consequence of this, you will be happy to note that we have reached a 33.4% contribution of the non-subsidy business, which was a mere 3% contribution to the total business in FY'20.”
To summarize and conclude
qa
“And in the medium term, we as Mahindra EPC are well-placed to take advantage of both our unique benefits from our parentage, as well as the emerging opportunities to deliver above industry performance.”
Aditya Shah
qa
“But if I were to simplify, the main reason would be that we have had a much higher share of project sales where our material costs tend to be lower than in the subsidy segment.”
Risks & concerns — 4 flagged
First, in the subsidy business, we have reduced business concentration risk with a better balance across states and across geographies.
— Coming to the year under review
Some parts of a business will help take out some of the inconsistency and unpredictability of a business that is operating only in the subsidy space because as we all know, it is cyclical and somewhat difficult to call.
— Aditya Shah
Ramesh Ramachandran: So the other expenses, like I was mentioning to Aditya earlier, it includes the impact of the growth in our irrigation projects.
— Jigar Shroff
So difficult to comment on that point, but needless to say, we will be very focused on growing faster than the industry.
— Ramesh Ramachandran
Advertisement
Q&A — 3 exchanges
Speaking time
11
7
5
2
1
1
Advertisement