Tata Chemicals Limited

rs,

ied. Important factors that could make a difference to the Company’s operations include, among others, economic conditions affecting demand / supply, price conditions in Government policies and regula

₹ 3,719

Volumes* (Soda Ash, Bicarb and Salt) 1,265 Kts (CQ) vs. 1,339 Kts (PQ) vs. 1,278 Kts (PY) Revenue ₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr

₹ 3,509

Bicarb and Salt) 1,265 Kts (CQ) vs. 1,339 Kts (PQ) vs. 1,278 Kts (PY) Revenue ₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 C

₹ 3,789

265 Kts (CQ) vs. 1,339 Kts (PQ) vs. 1,278 Kts (PY) Revenue ₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr

₹ 649

ts (PQ) vs. 1,278 Kts (PY) Revenue ₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY

₹ 327

Kts (PY) Revenue ₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (Exte

₹ 574

₹ 3,719 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (External) ₹ 4,972 Cr (

₹ 316

3,509 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 3,789 Cr (PY) EBITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (External) ₹ 4,972 Cr (Jun 25) vs. ₹ 4,884 C

₹ 175

BITDA ₹ 649 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ 327 Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (External) ₹ 4,972 Cr (Jun 25) vs. ₹ 4,884 Cr (Mar 25) Geography Demand Sentim

₹ 4,972

) vs. ₹ 574 Cr (PY) PAT** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (External) ₹ 4,972 Cr (Jun 25) vs. ₹ 4,884 Cr (Mar 25) Geography Demand Sentiment India China Asia ex. China & In

₹ 4,884

** ₹ 316 Cr (CQ) vs. ₹ (12) Cr (PQ) vs. ₹ 175 Cr (PY) #Net Debt (External) ₹ 4,972 Cr (Jun 25) vs. ₹ 4,884 Cr (Mar 25) Geography Demand Sentiment India China Asia ex. China & India Europe Americas ↑

₹ 75

pressure in all regions and lower volumes mainly on account of Lostock cessation. • PAT includes ₹ 75 Cr on account of Income-tax refund and interest * Lostock (UK) volumes removed ** PAT is from cont

Notes

1

Notes

Above financials are for Continuing Operations Consolidated financials is after adjusting SPV & other adjustments Rallis’ financials represent 100% share. Consolidated numbers is after adjustment of Rallis India’s NCI. 1. Before exceptional items and after JV share 2. Before exceptional items and NCI 3. After exceptional items and NCI Sales Volume Key Products India 802 62 US 869 73 Kenya 824 69 India UK 56 12 54 12 542 586 588 44 42 198 210 167 India UK 407 72 416 70 402 76 335 346 326 52 20 32 Q1FY26 Q4FY25 Q1FY25 Q1FY26 Q4FY25 Q1FY25 Q1FY26 Q4FY25 Q1FY25 * Lostock (UK) volumes removed Historical Financial Trends 3,998 3,730 3,475 3,789 3,999 3,590 3,509 3,719 1,066 1,093 1,090 1,047 1,009 1,166 1,219 1,169 Q2FY24 Q3FY24 Q4FY24 Q1FY25 Q2FY25 Q3FY25 Q4FY25 Q1FY26 Q2FY24 Q3FY24 Q4FY24 Q1FY25 Q2FY25 Q3FY25 Q4FY25 Q1FY26 20% 819 15% 542 13% 443 15% 574 15% 618 17% 649 12% 434 9% 327 Q2FY24 Q3FY24 Q4FY24 Q1FY25 Q2FY25 Q3FY25 Q4FY25 Q1FY26 10% 393 5% 194 4% 5% 145 175 7% 267 1% 49 0% (12)